Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42773461›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2026

Assessment of combined antiviral drug treatment against selected α-, β-, and γ-herpesviruses.

Lucio Fortelny, Christina Wangen, Debora Obergfäll, Kishore Dhotre, Friedrich Hahn, Julia Tillmanns, Manfred Marschall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucio FortelnyHarald zur Hausen Institute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Christina WangenHarald zur Hausen Institute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Debora ObergfällHarald zur Hausen Institute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Kishore DhotreHarald zur Hausen Institute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich HahnHarald zur Hausen Institute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Julia TillmannsHarald zur Hausen Institute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Manfred MarschallHarald zur Hausen Institute of Virology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. manfred.marschall@fau.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human herpesvirus infections cover a wide range of pathogenic outcomes and challenging situations in the medical field. All herpesviral α-, β-, and γ-subfamilies comprise representatives with a huge clinical impact on human health. The basic and translational research efforts are strongly directed towards the improved molecular understanding of infections and development of novel antiviral test systems and preventive measures. We utilized cell culture-based quantitative models for the assessment of antiviral prototype drugs against human and animal pathogenic herpesviruses. Our analysis focused on approved, developmental, and experimental compounds. All three investigated herpesviruses showed sensitivity against the selected antivirals. The single-drug antiviral treatments identified mean effective concentrations in the micromolar range, for abemaciclib (ABE) and the pharmacophore compound 020 (P-020), as well as submicromolar to nanomolar range, for brincidofovir (BCV) and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor of CDK7 (LDC4297). Time-of-addition experiments addressed questions of temporal potency of inhibition and effects on the expression of individual viral proteins. The results demonstrated that these drugs were mostly robust and did generally show moderate or no difference in antiviral activity when administered pre-, post-, or total duration-infection. By addressing the question of potential drug-drug synergies in combinatorial cotreatment settings, we identified effective conditions of combined antiherpesviral drug treatment (cAHT), such as ABE + LDC4297, as demonstrated for all three viruses. Thus, the study provides new information about antiherpesviral potency and characteristics of a selection of four antiviral prototype inhibitors. Especially, examples of broadness in synergistic combination treatment suggested options to improve antiherpesviral therapy strategies.

Indexed as

AlphaherpesvirinaeAntiviral AgentsBetaherpesvirinaeGammaherpesvirinaeAnimalsCell LineDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationHerpesviridae InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntiviral AgentsAntiviral drugsCombinatorial treatmentDrug-drug synergiesEfficacy and characteristics of selected drugsHerpesvirusesReporter-based analyses

Identifiers

PMID42773461
PMCPMC13595758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.