ArticleVirology journal2026
Assessment of combined antiviral drug treatment against selected α-, β-, and γ-herpesviruses.
Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human herpesvirus infections cover a wide range of pathogenic outcomes and challenging situations in the medical field. All herpesviral α-, β-, and γ-subfamilies comprise representatives with a huge clinical impact on human health. The basic and translational research efforts are strongly directed towards the improved molecular understanding of infections and development of novel antiviral test systems and preventive measures. We utilized cell culture-based quantitative models for the assessment of antiviral prototype drugs against human and animal pathogenic herpesviruses. Our analysis focused on approved, developmental, and experimental compounds. All three investigated herpesviruses showed sensitivity against the selected antivirals. The single-drug antiviral treatments identified mean effective concentrations in the micromolar range, for abemaciclib (ABE) and the pharmacophore compound 020 (P-020), as well as submicromolar to nanomolar range, for brincidofovir (BCV) and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor of CDK7 (LDC4297). Time-of-addition experiments addressed questions of temporal potency of inhibition and effects on the expression of individual viral proteins. The results demonstrated that these drugs were mostly robust and did generally show moderate or no difference in antiviral activity when administered pre-, post-, or total duration-infection. By addressing the question of potential drug-drug synergies in combinatorial cotreatment settings, we identified effective conditions of combined antiherpesviral drug treatment (cAHT), such as ABE + LDC4297, as demonstrated for all three viruses. Thus, the study provides new information about antiherpesviral potency and characteristics of a selection of four antiviral prototype inhibitors. Especially, examples of broadness in synergistic combination treatment suggested options to improve antiherpesviral therapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.