ArticleBMC public health2026
Increasing topical sunscreen use in German outdoor workers: results of a non-randomised controlled intervention study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a major environmental risk factor for skin cancer. Outdoor workers accumulate high lifetime UVR exposure and therefore face an increased risk of developing actinic keratoses and skin cancer. Despite established recommendations for sun protection, adherence among outdoor workers remains low. Improving access to sunscreen and providing targeted health education may help reduce barriers to sun-protective behaviour among outdoor workers. Therefore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of a workplace intervention designed to increase sunscreen use among outdoor workers.
methodsA non-randomised controlled intervention study was conducted among outdoor workers in Germany during one sun-exposure season (April-September 2025). Participants were assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention consisted of facilitated access to different sunscreen products combined with a brief structured health education on UVR risks and correct sunscreen use. Sunscreen use and sunburn occurrence were assessed using a questionnaire at baseline (T0), after three months (T1), and after six months (T2). The primary outcome was the proportion of workers reporting sunscreen use at least "sometimes". Longitudinal changes were analysed using generalised linear mixed models.
resultsA total of 234 outdoor workers were enrolled, with 117 participants in each group. After six months, 97 participants in the intervention group and 86 in the control group completed the study. At baseline, 54.7% of participants in both groups reported sunscreen use in general at least sometimes. At T2, this proportion increased to 83.5% in the intervention group compared with 52.3% in the control group. The number of reported sunburns decreased over time in both groups, with a stronger reduction observed in the intervention group; however, the group × time interaction did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsA simple workplace intervention consisting of facilitated sunscreen provision and brief health education was associated with a substantial increase in sunscreen use over the six-month follow-up period. This low-threshold approach represents a feasible and scalable strategy for occupational skin cancer prevention.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Osnabrück University and registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00035178; registration date: 10 October 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.