ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Hearing loss in HEMS operations: a prospective analysis of audiometric tests for temporary hearing threshold shift of an air rescue helicopter crew during several days of emergency duty.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHelicopter Emergency Medical (HEMS) crews are exposed to varying levels of noise at work. Noise levels regularly exceed 85 dB(A) and can be as high as 108 dB(A). Noise exposure can reduce concentration and cause hearing damage. The present study was conducted to assess objective Hearing sensitivity shift of air rescue crews.
methodsAudiometric data of HEMS crew of an Airbus EC 135 were collected during two months of duty at frequencies from 500 to 8000 Hz. Audiometric tests were performed at the beginning and end of a shift and, if possible, thirty minutes after every HEMS operation. Crew members were asked to complete a questionnaire before every measurement on ringing in the ears and exposure to elevated noise levels without hearing protection. Results of the audiometric measurements were analysed using linear mixed models for the whole group and for subgroups of pilots and medical personnel with and without additional hearing protection.
resultsOn 17 days with a median daily number of 6 HEMS flights, a total of n = 236 audiometric tests were conducted for 18 crew members, of whom four (22%) were pilots and fourteen (78%) were medical personnel. The mean noise exposure duration was 169.9 (± 49.2) minutes. The mean flight duration was 50 (± 40.2) minutes. Across all subgroups, subjects were able to hear a test tone at a mean level of 8.2 (± 11.1) dB(A) at the beginning of a shift and 11.7 (± 12.1) dB(A) at the end of a shift. The initial difference of hearing threshold between the left and the right ear was evened out over the work shift (beginning β = 2.9 p < 0,001vs. after noise exposure 0.2, p = 0.434). Hearing threshold shift was greater in medical personnel who wore no additional hearing protection (6.8 dB(A)) than in pilots (1.9 dB(A)) and medical personnel who used additional hearing protection (0.5 dB(A)). The greatest hearing threshold level occurred at frequencies between 4000 and 8000 Hz.
conclusionsHearing sensitivity of HEMS crews substantially declines over the course of a shift. Unprotected medical personnel seems more affected than pilots. Hearing threshold level is greater in left ears than in right ears and most severely affects the ability to hear high-frequency sounds. Helmets alone may not provide adequate hearing protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.