ArticleBMC genomic data2026
Population-resourced species-specific InDel markers for identifying putative interspecific hybrids between Populus euphratica and Populus pruinosa.
Article in BMC genomic data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPopulus euphratica and Populus pruinosa represent core germplasm resources of desert riparian forests in northwest China. Accurate discrimination of putative interspecific hybrids between the two species is fundamental to population genetic research of desert poplars. Currently, publicly available and standardized genome-wide InDel marker resources specifically for desert poplars remain scarce. Traditional morphological identification exhibits low accuracy and reliability, and conventional markers (RAPD, AFLP, SSR) have limited repeatability and species specificity, failing to support standardized genotyping. Based on large-scale whole-genome resequencing data, this study developed and validated a set of highly specific and stable InDel markers to provide valuable genomic resources for subsequent genetic research on desert poplars.
resultsA total of 56,864 interspecific InDel loci with fragment length differences over 5 bp were screened from 439 P. euphratica and 146 P. pruinosa resequencing accessions, among which 3,417 loci had interspecific allele frequency differences > 0.9. After primer design and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (native-PAGE) validation, 11 universal InDel primer pairs were obtained, and two robust diagnostic markers (P1599-3, P1599-4) were finally verified. Population validation involving 50 P. euphratica, 41 P. pruinosa and 93 morphologically selected putative-hybrid individuals revealed that this dual-marker set could reliably detect biparental banding patterns among tested candidates.
conclusionThe two verified co-dominant InDel markers provide reusable molecular resources for preliminary germplasm authentication and screening of putative hybrids within Populus sect. Turanga. The standardized screening and PAGE genotyping pipeline provided in this study can be transferred to other woody hybrid species, supporting marker-assisted breeding and germplasm conservation of arid poplars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.