ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
Systematic detection of predictive gene sets by semantics-based selection.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Gene Ontology (GO) is a public resource that describes gene functions and characteristics through a structured vocabulary of standardised terms. It currently contains annotations for over 1.5 million gene products, each linked to one or more GO terms. In this study, we propose integrating this GO-based semantic structure into machine learning systems for medical diagnostics. This approach serves a dual purpose: first, to prioritise genes that are semantically relevant to a given clinical task, thereby refining model input; and second, to enable the analysis of biologically predefined gene sets, which may reveal novel mechanisms underlying disease.
resultsEvaluated across 16 benchmark data sets spanning diverse medical domains, our GO term-informed gene selection method generally outperformed models trained on full gene sets. Further analysis of individual GO terms not only enhanced classification performance but also identified high-performing, task-specific gene subsets that were overlooked during initial gene selection.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that Gene Ontology can be effectively leveraged for semantics-aware gene selection in clinical machine learning. Moreover, systematically evaluating individual GO terms offers a scalable strategy to uncover new, testable biological hypotheses-revealing gene functions that might otherwise remain hidden when examining only broadly selected gene combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.