Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42773390›Full record

ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2026

Photoprotection properties of clothing measured across ultraviolet and visible wavelengths.

Rebecca Meehan, David Bajek, Rebecca Rendell, Michael Higlett, Marina Khazova, Kenny Wood, Ewan Eadie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca MeehanSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK. rcm23@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4951-7152
David BajekPhotobiology Unit, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Rebecca RendellUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.
Michael HiglettUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.
Marina KhazovaUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.
Kenny WoodSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK.
Ewan EadiePhotobiology Unit, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the photoprotective performance of commercially available clothing using a spectrophotometer with an integrating sphere. 37 different garments were analysed across multiple spectral protection factors. In addition to ultraviolet protection factor (UPF, 290-400 nm), measurements included UVA protection factor (UVA-PF, 315-400 nm), high-energy visible light protection factor (HEV-PF, 400-469 nm), visible light protection factor (Visible-PF, 400-800 nm), and Protoporphyrin IX protection factor (PpIX-PF, 350-800 nm), providing a broader assessment relevant to photosensitive skin disorders. Spectral transmittance of garments was measured and used to calculate the multiple protection factors across ultraviolet (UV) and visible wavelength ranges. Most garments demonstrated substantial UV protection, including items not marketed as sun protective. Darker fabrics, particularly black cotton and polyester, showed the highest UPF values, frequently exceeding 50, whereas lighter fabrics, especially white cotton, generally offered lower protection (a UPF < 40). Protection was not correlated with garment cost, with some low-priced items providing excellent performance. Dark-coloured garments also offered superior attenuation of high-energy visible light, although transmission increased at longer visible wavelengths across all samples. These findings highlight the limitations of relying on UPF alone to assess textile photoprotection. A multi-spectral approach reveals important differences in protection against UVA, HEV, and visible light, which are clinically relevant for individuals with photosensitivity. This work supports the inclusion of extended photoprotective metrics in textile evaluation and clinical guidance.

Identifiers

PMID42773390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.