ArticleBehavior research methods2026
The English Pseudoword Lexicon Project (EPLeP): A resource for investigating pseudoword processing.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, psycholinguistics has seen an increase in research focused on the processing of written stimuli that are not attested in the lexicon of a given language. We introduce the English Pseudoword Lexicon Project (EPLeP), a new database of lexical decision data for English pseudowords, nonwords, and words. While large-scale behavioral data have been collected for lexical and non-lexical items in English and other languages, none of these datasets have specifically focused on pseudowords. The EPLeP database fills this gap by considering three types of English-like non-lexical stimuli: (1) morphologically simple pseudowords generated from existing English words; (2) morphologically complex pseudowords obtained by combining existing stems and existing suffixes; and (3) nonwords, not following English graphotactics. This registered report provides an extensive overview of the steps adopted in producing non-lexical stimuli and the criteria for their selection. We collected data for almost 13,500 non-lexical and 4,400 lexical stimuli from 1,416 English-speaking participants across four online studies. Analyses of behavioral responses show that morphologically complex pseudowords trigger the deepest level of processing, whereas nonwords elicit the shallowest processing, reflecting a crucial difference in how these stimuli affect responses to words. This database will be a valuable tool for researchers interested in both pseudoword and word processing, enabling them to evaluate hypotheses by analyzing the collected behavioral data or using them to select stimuli for future studies. The Stage 1 protocol was accepted in principle on July 4, 2025 ( https://osf.io/cz9rh/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.