ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
DentSeg3: A Three-Branch Specialized Fusion Network for Dental Lesion Segmentation in Color Images.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A three-branch fused semantic segmentation framework for color dental images is proposed for the joint segmentation of caries, cavities, cracks, tooth, and background. Accurate lesion segmentation is challenging due to subtle visual cues, inter-patient variability, and class imbalance. To address this, a neural network integrating three complementary branches is designed: (i) DeepLabv3 + with a ResNet-18 backbone to model large anatomical structures; (ii) a hierarchical Vision Transformer (ViT)-based branch with patch embedding only in the first block and self-attention over progressively downsampled feature maps, enabling contextual validation of spatially dispersed lesions; and (iii) a dual-attention branch combining CBAM and a Texture-Aware Attention (TAA) module to enhance fine-grained textures. These designs enable functional specialization and effective multi-scale fusion. Experimental results against classical clustering, encoder-decoder, and recent attention- and transformer-based methods show that the fused model achieves the best overall performance among the evaluated methods, achieving 96.2% accuracy, 93.6% Dice, 92.9% IoU, 93.8% precision, and 93.7% recall with data augmentation. Ablation studies confirm that gains mainly arise from branch fusion. Grad-CAM analysis reveals complementary activation patterns, improved boundary delineation, and robustness to background variability. Overall, the proposed framework provides a robust semantic segmentation solution with consistent cross-device generalization across different imaging conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42773344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.