Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42773225›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Immunohistochemical expression of p53 is a helpful surrogate marker in the differential diagnosis of primary ovarian mucinous tumors: a large study of 181 cases of mucinous borderline tumor and carcinoma.

Pavel Dundr, Isabela Töltési, Michaela Kendall Bártů, Jana Drozenová, Pavel Fabian, Oluwole Fadare, Jitka Hausnerová, Jan Laco, Sigurd F Lax, Radoslav Matěj and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Pavel DundrDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Studničkova 2, Prague 2, 12800, Czech Republic. pavel.dundr@vfn.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-6124
Isabela TöltésiDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Studničkova 2, Prague 2, 12800, Czech Republic.
Michaela Kendall BártůDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Studničkova 2, Prague 2, 12800, Czech Republic.
Jana DrozenováDepartment of Pathology, Charles University, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, 10034, Czech Republic.
Pavel FabianDepartment of Oncological Pathology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Oluwole FadareDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jitka HausnerováDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan LacoThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Sigurd F LaxDepartment of Pathology, General Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria, and Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Radoslav MatějDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Studničkova 2, Prague 2, 12800, Czech Republic.
Ivana StružinskáDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Studničkova 2, Prague 2, 12800, Czech Republic.
Zuzana ŠpůrkováDepartment of Pathology, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Barbora WeberováDepartment of Pathology, AGEL Hospital, Přerov, Czech Republic.
Simona StolnicuDepartment of Pathology, George E. Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania.
Marián ŠvajdlerŠikl's Department of Pathology, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
W Glenn McCluggageDepartment of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Romana VránkováDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Studničkova 2, Prague 2, 12800, Czech Republic.
Kristýna NěmejcováDepartment of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Studničkova 2, Prague 2, 12800, Czech Republic.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund BBMRI_CZ LM2023033Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky MH CZ DRO-VFN 64165Univerzita Karlova v Praze Project UNCE 24/MED/018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary ovarian mucinous tumors represent a group of tumors in which the diagnosis can be difficult in some cases. The most problematic aspect is the distinction between mucinous borderline tumor (MBT) and mucinous carcinoma (MC) with expansile type of invasion. Ancillary markers to help this distinction would be beneficial, but due to the overlapping immunohistochemical and molecular features, no markers are currently widely used in this scenario. However, a recent study showed that the immunohistochemical expression of p53 with a discriminatory cut-off of 30% tumor cells with strong nuclear expression can be used as a surrogate, but this finding has not been validated in an independent series of ovarian mucinous tumors. In our study, we analyzed 181 ovarian mucinous tumors (MBT, MC or equivocal), focusing on the practical significance of p53 expression in differential diagnosis, including assessment of the value of the proposed 30% strong expression cut-off. Of the tumors included in the study, 23/109 (21.1%) cases of MBT, 42/60 (70%) cases of MC, and 8/12 (66.7%) of mucinous tumors classified as equivocal (overlap between MBT and MC) showed an abnormal p53 staining pattern, including cases with expression in ≥ 30% of tumor cells, cases with complete negativity, and cases with abnormal cytoplasmic staining. In conclusion, the results of our study confirm that p53 immunohistochemical staining can be of practical use in the differential diagnosis of ovarian mucinous tumors. Our receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses demonstrated that although cut-offs lower than 30% yielded slightly higher overall discriminatory performance, the predefined ≥ 30% threshold provided substantially higher specificity, which is likely more relevant in routine diagnostic practice. In the setting of morphologically equivocal ovarian mucinous tumors, higher specificity may reduce the risk of overdiagnosing MBT as MC, while still identifying a substantial subset of malignant tumors.

Indexed as

Mucinous borderline tumorMucinous carcinomaOvarian mucinous tumorsp53 immunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID42773225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.