Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42773102›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Reservation policies and equity in national park access.

Jonathan E Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan E HughesDepartment of Economics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. jonathan.e.hughes@colorado.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4395-9986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National parks are experiencing unprecedented demand. High use strains infrastructure, damages ecosystems and reduces visitor enjoyment. To sustainably manage visitation, many parks now require reservations, raising concerns about equity. We quantify the effects of two reservation system features, advance purchase windows and competition for permits, on visitor income at seven national parks. Both effects disproportionately favor higher-income users. In the most competitive day-ahead and advance markets, reservation holders come from zip codes with 3-5% higher median household income. Extending the advance purchase window to six months shifts reservations toward users residing in zip codes with 5% higher income. Robustness checks imply individual effects of the same direction. This underscores a key challenge for park managers: designing reservation systems that protect resources while ensuring broad access. Without attention to distributional impacts, efforts to control crowding risk exacerbating income-based disparities in who can visit and enjoy the nation's public lands.

Identifiers

PMID42773102
PMCPMC13597496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.