ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026
Evaluation of Vaccine Cold Chain Practices in Healthcare Facilities of the Republic of Korea: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated vaccine cold chain management and storage practices in Korean healthcare facilities to identify strengths and gaps, with a focus on private healthcare facilities and public health centers. We aimed to assess compliance with national guidelines and World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on vaccine storage, handling, and emergency preparedness.
methodsA cross-sectional nationwide survey was conducted in 53 immunization service providers (43 private healthcare facilities and 10 public health centers). A structured checklist and questionnaire were used to audit equipment, temperature monitoring, inventory management, and emergency preparedness practices at each site. Key indicators were recorded.
resultsAll facilities had functional refrigeration for vaccines, with 53 (100.0%) having a dedicated vaccine refrigerator and 4 (7.5%) had a dedicated vaccine freezer. However, 39 facilities (73.6%) had continuous temperature monitoring devices in installed on all of their refrigeration units, and alarm systems were present in 44 (83.0%) of sites. Proper vaccine placement (center shelf, away from vents) was observed in 52 (98.1%) of facilities, and 51 facilities (96.2%) appropriately stored live vaccines to shield them from sunlight. 52 sites (98.1%) maintained up-to-date vaccine inventory records and all sites adhered to recommended procedures for disposing expired doses. Notably, 28 (52.8%) had documented emergency plans, such as a backup system, though fewer, 27 (40.9%), tested their backup power regularly.
conclusionThis nationwide audit reveals generally sound cold chain infrastructure in Korean healthcare facilities, alongside specific deficiencies. While most facilities meet basic standards for equipment and record-keeping, improvements are needed in continuous temperature monitoring, alarm systems, and emergency backup provisions. Strengthening training and oversight in these areas will help ensure vaccine potency and supply security throughout the immunization delivery system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.