ArticleeNeuro2026
The orbitofrontal-anterior temporal network complements the attention network for where to look in social situations.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human neuroimaging experiments have consistently found dorsal and ventral attention networks subserving spatial shifts of covert attention or eye movements. However, these experiments used abstract, artificial stimuli for better experimental stimulus control and clearly defined instructions about where to attend or what to search for. This clearly is not an adequate model of eye movement control in natural environments full of semantic and social information. Here, we show that during movie viewing, activation of the dorsal and ventral attention networks was complemented by activation patterns in orbitofrontal and anterior temporal cortex, previously not implicated in human eye movement control, supporting individual decisions where to look. This effect was largely driven by looking at faces. We compared similarity relationships between eye fixation patterns on the one hand and brain activity patterns on the other hand in human participants of either sex. Searching for between-scenes changes in activation patterns that mirrored changes in fixation patterns, we were able to identify the attention networks defined by previous experiments with artificial stimuli. In contrast, interindividual differences in fixation patterns, indicative of endogenous decisions about where to look, were mirrored by activation pattern differences in orbitofrontal and anterior temporal cortex, particularly for scenes presenting faces. Thus, we could precisely replicate the role of the attention networks in a more natural viewing environment. Crucially, we also showed that previous lab experiments, lacking the complexity of free viewing in a naturalistic environment, overlooked the importance of the orbitofrontal - anterior temporal network for individual differences in active vision. Our findings show that the orbitofrontal - anterior temporal network needs to be considered in studies of active vision, particularly in social situations.
Identifiers
42772940What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.