Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42772816›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026

TIDES 2.0: A protocol for examining the prevalence and longitudinal course of depression, anxiety and behaviour problems in children with cystic fibrosis under 12 years of age.

Beth A Smith, David H Barker, Anna M Georgiopoulos, Michael S Schechter, Minu P Mohan, Lovejit Singh, Gurnoor Mutti, Alexandra L Quittner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07048574 (TIDES 2.0), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07048574 recruitingnot on this map

TIDES 2.0: Prevalence and Longitudinal Course of Depression, Anxiety, and Behavior Problems in Children With Cystic Fibrosis Under 12 Years of Age

TypeobservationalSponsorState University of New York at BuffaloRan2025 to 2028Enrolled600ConditionsCystic Fibrosis (CF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beth A SmithJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA balucas@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2988-4300
David H BarkerBrown University Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Anna M GeorgiopoulosMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael S SchechterChildren's Hospital of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Minu P MohanJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Lovejit SinghJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Gurnoor MuttiJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Alexandra L QuittnerJoe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Hollywood, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntegration of mental health screening and treatment into cystic fibrosis (CF) care has been driven by the finding of elevated rates of depression and anxiety in The International Depression/Anxiety Epidemiological Study (TIDES), international mental health guidelines and CF Foundation support to screen adolescents and adults in all US CF care centres. Benefits of screening include earlier identification, greater access to care, reduced stigma and positive uptake from the CF community. However, TIDES did not include children under 12 years. Depression and anxiety have increased dramatically in young children, and new guidelines recommend mental health screening of children in primary care. Given the paediatric mental health crisis and the widespread adoption of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, which have been associated with adverse events (AEs), there is an urgent need to gather mental health data in young children with CF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TIDES 2.0 is a longitudinal cohort study designed to evaluate the prevalence of depression, anxiety and behaviour problems in US children with CF 18 months through 11 years, evaluate and compare the performance of two widely used instruments to identify the optimal screening measures for this population and characterise neuropsychiatric AEs associated with CFTR modulator therapy. Purposive randomised sampling is used to recruit 600 children at 16 CF centres across 4 regions of the US, with oversampling of minoritised patients to ensure national representation. We will estimate the prevalence of children above the clinical cut-score on each symptom domain and evaluate their longitudinal course and predictors. Rigorous mixed-methods approaches will be used to describe potential AEs associated with modulator use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is a timely step in understanding the mental health of young children with CF. It will provide the groundwork to extend mental health screening and care to younger children with CF and inform updates to the mental healthcare guidelines. These results will be distributed at international CF meetings and submitted to peer-reviewed journals. The University at Buffalo Institutional Review Board approved the study (STUDY00008868). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07048574.

Indexed as

AnxietyCystic FibrosisDepressionProblem BehaviorChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicPrevalenceUnited StatesCystic FibrosisPsychology

Identifiers

PMID42772816
PMCPMC13599926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.