Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42772742›Full record

ArticleEcology2026

Native earthworms and roe deer in temperate forests: Friends in the sun, foes in the shade.

Ludwig Lettenmaier, Nico Eisenhauer, Simone Cesarz, Christian Ammer, Anna Bucharova, Sebastian Dittrich, Ronja Hausmann, Daniel Kraus, Angelika Kölbl, Soumen Mallick and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ludwig LettenmaierField Station Fabrikschleichach, Chair of Conservation Biology and Forest Ecology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-2287
Nico EisenhauerGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-6720
Simone CesarzGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2334-5119
Christian AmmerSilviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-0135
Anna BucharovaDepartment of Biology, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-5426
Sebastian DittrichInstitute of General Ecology and Environmental Protection, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Tharandt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-508X
Ronja HausmannField Station Fabrikschleichach, Chair of Conservation Biology and Forest Ecology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5859-2962
Daniel KrausUniversitätsforstamt, University of Würzburg, Haßfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9645-4829
Angelika KölblBavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-2271
Soumen MallickField Station Fabrikschleichach, Chair of Conservation Biology and Forest Ecology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-7919
Giorgi MamadashviliForest Protection Division, Forest Maintenance and Reforestation Department, National Forestry Agency, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2168-716X
Atle MysterudCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8993-7382
Kerstin PierickSilviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-4601
Rike SchwarzGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-7258
Jörg MüllerField Station Fabrikschleichach, Chair of Conservation Biology and Forest Ecology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Rauhenebrach, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1409-1586
Christian RistokGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1446-977X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 459717468EU European Regional Development Fund 20-3044-2-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given increasing deer populations and rising canopy openness through tree mortality in European forests, understanding how these changes affect above-belowground communities and ecosystem functioning is becoming more important. Earthworms comprise the largest animal biomass in European forest soils and play a central role in decomposition, carbon and nutrient cycling, and soil formation. However, their responses to canopy openness and deer browsing have been studied almost exclusively in northern North America, where interactions involve white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mainly non-native and invasive earthworms. Here, we examine how roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and canopy openness interactively affect native earthworm communities in a temperate European forest across 75 experimental patches: 54 closed-canopy and 21 experimentally created canopy-gap patches. Five years after gap establishment, we sampled earthworms and associated environmental variables from two plots per patch: exclosure (fenced) and control (unfenced) plots. We found that roe deer and canopy gaps interactively influenced earthworm communities. Under closed canopy, roe deer reduced earthworm biomass and density. If roe deer were absent, canopy gaps had no effect on earthworms, but if roe deer were present, canopy gaps increased biomass and density through vegetation-mediated pathways and enhanced soil water content. The magnitude of these effects differed among earthworm ecological groups (anecic species, i.e., earthworms that create deep, permanent burrows and connect surface litter with deeper soil layers, vs. endogeic species, i.e., earthworms that live and feed entirely within the soil) and life stages (juveniles vs. adults). Indirect effects of roe deer were particularly beneficial for juveniles. These results contrast with patterns reported for white-tailed deer and non-native earthworms in northern North American forests, where white-tailed deer presence typically promotes earthworms. Our results on the direct and indirect effects of roe deer on belowground earthworms shed new light on the complex interactions of deer populations and canopy structure on forest soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

Indexed as

DeerForestsOligochaetaAnimalsBiomassabove‐belowground interactionsbrowsingcanopy gapdisturbanceLumbricidaesoil biodiversitysoil microbial biomasssoil pHsoil water contentungulatesvegetation

Identifiers

PMID42772742
PMCPMC13597149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.