ArticleEcology2026
Native earthworms and roe deer in temperate forests: Friends in the sun, foes in the shade.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given increasing deer populations and rising canopy openness through tree mortality in European forests, understanding how these changes affect above-belowground communities and ecosystem functioning is becoming more important. Earthworms comprise the largest animal biomass in European forest soils and play a central role in decomposition, carbon and nutrient cycling, and soil formation. However, their responses to canopy openness and deer browsing have been studied almost exclusively in northern North America, where interactions involve white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mainly non-native and invasive earthworms. Here, we examine how roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and canopy openness interactively affect native earthworm communities in a temperate European forest across 75 experimental patches: 54 closed-canopy and 21 experimentally created canopy-gap patches. Five years after gap establishment, we sampled earthworms and associated environmental variables from two plots per patch: exclosure (fenced) and control (unfenced) plots. We found that roe deer and canopy gaps interactively influenced earthworm communities. Under closed canopy, roe deer reduced earthworm biomass and density. If roe deer were absent, canopy gaps had no effect on earthworms, but if roe deer were present, canopy gaps increased biomass and density through vegetation-mediated pathways and enhanced soil water content. The magnitude of these effects differed among earthworm ecological groups (anecic species, i.e., earthworms that create deep, permanent burrows and connect surface litter with deeper soil layers, vs. endogeic species, i.e., earthworms that live and feed entirely within the soil) and life stages (juveniles vs. adults). Indirect effects of roe deer were particularly beneficial for juveniles. These results contrast with patterns reported for white-tailed deer and non-native earthworms in northern North American forests, where white-tailed deer presence typically promotes earthworms. Our results on the direct and indirect effects of roe deer on belowground earthworms shed new light on the complex interactions of deer populations and canopy structure on forest soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.