ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Large Language Models for Clinical Data Extraction in Workplace Injury Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Retrospective Pilot Study of Accuracy, Fairness, and Methodological Considerations in Workers' Compensation Medical Chart Review.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic medical charts within Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) specialty programs contain rich but unstructured clinical and sociodemographic data essential for injury classification, treatment planning, and compensation decisions. Manual chart review is time-consuming, inconsistent, and susceptible to reviewer bias. Large language models (LLMs) extract complex information from unstructured clinical text, yet their application to workplace injury rehabilitation remains unexplored.
objectiveThis study will evaluate the accuracy, fairness, and methodological implications of using LLMs to extract clinical and rehabilitative information from WSIB medical charts at Trillium Health Partners (THP), Canada. We will assess model performance, examine algorithmic bias across demographic subgroups, and explore ethical implications for clinical decision-making and workplace compensation.
methodsWe will conduct a retrospective review of 50 medical charts from the WSIB Back and Neck specialty program at THP, spanning January 2018 to December 2024. General-purpose models (Qwen3-VL-8B and InternVL3.5-8B) and domain-specific biomedical models (MedGemma-27B and LLaMA-3-Meditron-8B) will be evaluated off the shelf using zero-shot and few-shot prompting; the biomedical models will also be fine-tuned. Charts will be partitioned at the chart level into development, training, and held-out test sets, preventing leakage across purposes. Ground truth will be established by independent human annotation of all 50 charts, with interannotator agreement quantified using Cohen κ. The primary outcome is the macroaveraged F
resultsThis study was funded by the Data Sciences Institute at the University of Toronto in April 2025; the award supported protocol development and ended on April 30, 2026. As of August 12, 2026, neither had a research ethics application been submitted nor had any chart been accessed. Applications to the THP and University of Toronto research ethics boards are anticipated in late 2026, and no data will be retrieved or processed before approval from both boards. Contingent on approval and further funding, data collection is anticipated through 2027, analysis in late 2027 to early 2028, and results submitted for publication in 2028.
conclusionsThis protocol describes the first systematic evaluation of LLM-based data extraction applied to workplace injury medical charts. Findings will inform best practices for the responsible, reproducible, and equitable integration of these tools into occupational health and workers' compensation decision-making. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/99807.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.