ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2026
A retrospective metagenomic analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation donors from five countries: Safety considerations for donor screening and core microbiome profiles of qualified donors.
Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been successfully applied on clinical aspects, but its clinical outcomes remain unpredictable due to inconsistent donor screening protocols across hospitals, institutions, and countries. Hence, a retrospective analysis of metagenomic data from published studies on FMT donors via a unified bioinformatics workflow might contribute to the understanding of the safety considerations for donor screening and the fecal microbial profiles of qualified donors. In this study, we reanalyzed metagenomic data of 475 screened donor fecal samples from 24 studies spanning China, the USA, Canada, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. The genomic safety risks were evaluated by profiling antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and virulence factors (VFs), the results of which showed that no major toxin-associated virulence genes, such as Shiga toxin, Shiga-like toxin, or botulinum neurotoxin (BoNTs) genes harbored in the detected Escherichia coli, Clostridium butyricum, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, but several high-risk ARGs remained insufficiently addressed. The distribution of ARG-harboring bacteria in eligible FMT donors was country-specific. The alpha-diversity and microbial community structure were comparable between donor fecal samples from China and the USA. Interestingly, the core microbiome in fecal samples from Canada, the Netherlands, and New Zealand formed a single guild, while that from China and the USA formed two guilds, with predominantly positive intra-guild and negative inter-guild correlations, indicating that the co-abundance patterns of the core microbiome were conserved among certain countries. Furthermore, an exploratory retrospective classifier was developed based on core microbiome profiles to distinguish eligible FMT donors from general healthy individuals. These results provide evidence for integrating metagenomic sequencing into future FMT donor screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.