Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42772139›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Adaptive responses to fractionated feeding: transient hyperphagia and reversible hepatic lipid deposition in mule ducks.

Laura-Lou Zwick, Romain Szczepaniak, Kevin Coustaut, Tsogzolmaa Galbadrakh, Marie Lasserre, Yan Fericelli, Karine Ricaud, Sandra Biasutti, Karine Gontier, Jérôme Roy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura-Lou ZwickUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Romain SzczepaniakUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Kevin CoustautAVIPOLE, INRAE, Benquet, 40280, France.
Tsogzolmaa GalbadrakhUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Marie LasserreUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Yan FericelliUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Karine RicaudUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Sandra BiasuttiUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Karine GontierUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Jérôme RoyUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Stéphane PanseratUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France.
Marianne HoussierUniversité de Pau et des Pays de L'Adour, INRAE, NUMEA, Mont de Marsan, 40000, France. Electronic address: marianne.houssier@univ-pau.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines a fractionated feeding protocol and analyzes its effects on feed intake and hepatic energy storage in mule ducks. The protocol was applied to 140 animals and included a 5-day acclimation phase with time-restricted feeding (1 h without quantitative restriction), followed by 21 one-hour meals delivered every 12 h, characterized as the fattening phase. Animals were then returned to ad libitum continuous access to food (24 h/day). During the acclimation phase, feed intake increased from 154.97 ± 23.31 to 316.04 ± 22.72 g/animal/meal, reaching 584.59 ± 47.16 g per animal on the first day of fattening phase. Intake remained higher than under ad libitum feeding during the first four days of the fattening phase before stabilizing at around 300 g/day/animal. Different measure and sampling were performed before the first meal of the fattening phase, 6 h after the third meal, and after each odd-numbered meal up to the 21st, as well as after the 4-day return to ad libitum feeding. Mean liver weight was 66.6 ± 10.6 g before the first meal, increased to 134.0 ± 25.2 g after the third meal, and then decreased thereafter to reach 97.4 ± 18.6 g after the 21th meal. However, liver weight remained higher than under fasting and ad libitum feeding conditions for most of the fattening period. Hepatic glycogen remained high (10-15 %) between the third and 21st meals, corresponding to the maximum level achievable by the liver and higher than under continuous ad libitum feeding. Total hepatic lipids increased from 5.54 ± 0.542% before the first meal to 7.68 ± 1.55% after the third meal, before decreasing from the fifth meal onward and gradually returning to their initial level over the entire fattening period. Transcript levels were higher after the third meal than those measured prior to the first meal and under ad libitum feeding conditions for ACC, FASN and ELOVL6. Subsequently, expression levels declined to intermediate values, paralleling the decrease in total lipid content. Overall, although lipid accumulation remained limited, the protocol maintained near-maximal hepatic glycogen levels, a key prerequisite for fattening.

Indexed as

Duck nutritionFeeding behaviorFractionated feedingHepatic metabolismLipogenesis

Identifiers

PMID42772139
PMCPMC13625788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.