Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771889›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Patterns of Telemedicine Use and the Digital Divide Among Adults in Poland's Postpandemic Era: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.

Aleksander Biesiada, Anna Zimny-Zając, Karolina Kłoda, Mateusz Babicki, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, Beata Jankowska-Polańska, Siddarth Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aleksander BiesiadaPolish Society of Family Medicine, Syrokomli 1, Wrocław, Lower Silesia, 51-141, Poland, 48 71-32-66-870, 48 71-325-43-41.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-5400
Anna Zimny-ZającFaculty of Health Science, Institute of Public Health, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Lesser Poland, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5566-6278
Karolina KłodaPolish Society of Family Medicine, Syrokomli 1, Wrocław, Lower Silesia, 51-141, Poland, 48 71-32-66-870, 48 71-325-43-41.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0395-9826
Mateusz BabickiPolish Society of Family Medicine, Syrokomli 1, Wrocław, Lower Silesia, 51-141, Poland, 48 71-32-66-870, 48 71-325-43-41.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-6959
Agnieszka Mastalerz-MigasPolish Society of Family Medicine, Syrokomli 1, Wrocław, Lower Silesia, 51-141, Poland, 48 71-32-66-870, 48 71-325-43-41.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-2760
Beata Jankowska-PolańskaFaculty of Medicine, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Lower Silesia, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-8044
Siddarth AgrawalLabplus R&D, Wrocław, Lower Silesia, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-5090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic transformed telemedicine in Poland from a niche service into a core mode of health care delivery, supported by nationwide eHealth infrastructure such as obligatory e-prescriptions and the central P1 platform. Despite this rapid expansion, concerns persist that the benefits of digital health are not shared equally, and that a digital divide limits equitable access to telemedicine services across sociodemographic and geographic groups. Objective: This study aimed to describe the patterns of telemedicine and eHealth tool use among Polish adults in the postpandemic era, to identify key sociodemographic, economic, and health-related predictors of their adoption, and to map digital inequalities in access to health care services. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the "National Test for Poles' Health" (Narodowy Test Zdrowia Polaków), a nationwide online survey conducted annually in Poland between 2020 and 2024. The full surveyed sample comprised 1,196,102 adults, of whom 820,000 completed the telemedicine-use module and formed the analytic sample; detailed questions on 12 specific eHealth services were administered to a randomly assigned subsample of 120,000 respondents under a split-questionnaire design. Sociodemographic factors (age, gender, education level, and place of residence), health status, and barriers to accessing care were analyzed as predictors using ordered and binary logistic regression models, with results expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs, and statistical significance set at Results: Overall, 49.7% (407,502/820,000) of respondents reported using a telemedicine visit at least once in the preceding 12 months. Telephone consultations were the most common form of remote visit (43,598/120,000, 36.3%), whereas video consultations were rare (8736/120,000, 7.3%). System-driven tools showed high adoption (e-prescriptions: 87,121/120,000, 72.6%; e-referrals: 64,083/120,000, 53.4%), while patient-driven tools, such as mobile health apps (24,341/120,000, 20.3%), were used less frequently. Education and place of residence were the strongest sociodemographic predictors: participants with a master's degree were 2.2 times more likely than those with secondary education to use the Internet Patient Account (OR 2.2, 95% CI 2.1-2.2), and residents of cities with over 500,000 inhabitants had higher odds of telemedicine use (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.5-1.6). Chronic disease was a strong health-related predictor (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7-1.9). Gender differences were also observed: women used telephone consultations more often, whereas men more frequently used the Internet Patient Account. Conclusions: Telemedicine adoption in postpandemic Poland is driven more by pre-existing socioeconomic advantage, particularly higher education and urban residence, than by clinical need alone, indicating a persistent digital divide. Telemedicine functions largely as a tool of convenience for the already connected rather than a tool of necessity for underserved groups. Targeted interventions, including community-based digital literacy programs, investment in rural broadband infrastructure, and guaranteed hybrid in-person alternatives, are needed to ensure that Poland's eHealth transformation promotes inclusion rather than exacerbating health inequalities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Digital DivideTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesdigital exclusioneHealthe-prescriptionshealth care accessteleconsultationstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42771889
PMCPMC13597080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.