Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771883›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026

Parents' Experiences From Participating in an Online Peer Support Child Feeding Intervention: The "PICNIC Sweden" Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Kerith Duncanson, Anna Jörnvi, Sara Ask, Malin Högman, Erica Belestam Vikman, Richard Ball, Maria Henström Engblom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kerith DuncansonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle Australia, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-6589
Anna JörnviDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Blickagången 16, Huddinge, Stockholm, 141 83, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1518-0109
Sara AskSara Ask Produktion AB, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6445-1840
Malin HögmanDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Blickagången 16, Huddinge, Stockholm, 141 83, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3490-0466
Erica Belestam VikmanDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Blickagången 16, Huddinge, Stockholm, 141 83, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7072-1413
Richard BallHealth Promotion, Mid North Coast Local Health District, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4108-0464
Maria Henström EngblomDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Blickagången 16, Huddinge, Stockholm, 141 83, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-4204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Parents' feeding practices play a role in shaping children's dietary patterns, which influence chronic disease risk. Feeding children is challenging, so parents need guidance and support. Parents In Child Nutrition Informing Community (PICNIC) is an Australian program that promotes responsive child feeding using dietitian-led training and online communication, then facilitates peer-to-peer information sharing within parents' social networks. Objective: This pilot study aimed to test the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and perceived impact of PICNIC with Swedish parents. Methods: This explanatory sequential mixed methods study involved 47 parents of children aged 0 to 24 months. Parents attended a 2-hour online dietitian-led workshop, followed by 2 months of child nutrition and feeding support in a moderated, closed Facebook group. Quantitative data from digital questionnaires (n=43) were analyzed and integrated with qualitative findings from thematic analysis of semistructured interviews (n=15). Results: Parents attended 1 of 10 workshops, and 4 to 5 posts per week (of which 20% were participants' questions) were shared in the project's Facebook group. Both quantitative and qualitative data indicated parents' child feeding knowledge and parental self-efficacy increased after participation. Parents reported that the intervention filled a gap in the existing support from child health services, strengthening their confidence in child feeding, while providing a sense of recognition and community. PICNIC information was described as trustworthy, shareable, and something to "lean on." Parents valued the social interaction during the workshops but also suggested providing recorded content for easier access. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated high acceptability and appropriateness of the PICNIC intervention model among parents in Sweden. This study will inform the design of an adapted version of PICNIC to be offered through child health services.

Indexed as

child feedingchild healthchild health serviceschild nutritionfeasibility studiesparentpeer educationpeer supportprimary preventionresponsive feeding

Identifiers

PMID42771883
PMCPMC13597015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.