Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771877›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

Semantic Similarity Search Approach to Extract Exemplars of Stigmatizing and Positive Language in Obstetric Clinical Notes: Exploratory Study.

Jihye Kim Scroggins, Ismael Ibrahim Hulchafo, Veronica Barcelona, Anahita Davoudi, Hans Moen, Sarah Harkins, Danielle Scharp, Kenrick Cato, Michele Tadiello, Maxim Topaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jihye Kim ScrogginsSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 Medical Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, United States, 1 (919) 966-4260.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0864-7867
Ismael Ibrahim HulchafoSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5504-4646
Veronica BarcelonaSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3070-1716
Anahita DavoudiVNS Health, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4345-3889
Hans MoenDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1418-7892
Sarah HarkinsSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2528-7186
Danielle ScharpIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3265-6667
Kenrick CatoSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-3826
Michele TadielloCenter for Community-Engaged Health Informatics and Data Science, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5351-095X
Maxim TopazSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-9837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Natural language processing can extract meaningful information from clinical notes. However, human annotation is time-consuming and costly, and scarce data poses a challenge. Objective: This study aimed to explore a semantic similarity search approach to extract exemplars of stigmatizing and positive language in obstetric clinical notes. Methods: We used electronic health record data from labor and birth admissions at 2 hospitals in the United States from 2017 to 2019. We used a semantic similarity search approach, which used 200 randomly selected true exemplars, stratified by language categories, as queries to search for similar exemplar candidates. We extracted the top 5 candidates with the highest cosine similarities, which were assessed for accuracy. Results: We retrieved 1000 candidates. An average precision of 0.69 was achieved when candidates with cosine similarity thresholds of 0.75 or higher were included, at which point 68.8% (64/93) of exemplar candidates accurately represented true cases. At the 0.75 threshold, the proportion of true cases was higher for preferred language (41/56, 73.2%) and unilateral/authoritarian decisions (5/7, 71.4%). The proportion of true cases was lower for difficult patients (2/7, 28.6%) and marginalized identities (3/9, 33.3%). Conclusions: The semantic similarity search approach shows promise in efficiently extracting exemplars while reducing the annotation burden, laying the groundwork for future applications in other domains.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingObstetricsSemanticsStereotypingFemaleHumansLanguagePregnancyUnited Statesbiaselectronic health recordshealth communicationnatural language processingstigmatizing language

Identifiers

PMID42771877
PMCPMC13597023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.