ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2026
Short-term health impacts of air pollution in Canada: a nonlinear multi-pollutant Bayesian case-crossover framework.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost short-term air pollution studies rely on linear, single-pollutant models that cannot adequately describe the nonlinear and interdependent nature of pollutant-health associations.
methodsWe developed a nonlinear multi-pollutant Bayesian case-crossover model to jointly evaluate short-term health effects of PM 2.5, NO2, and O3. The model accommodates overdispersion, propagates exposure uncertainty from imputed monitoring data, and pools Census Division (CD)-specific exposure-response functions through a Bayesian hierarchical framework. We applied this approach to cause-specific daily mortality (2001-2015) and hospitalization (2001-2018) data across 20 Canadian CDs, covering more than half of the national population.
resultsThe estimated exposure-response relationships varied by pollutant and health outcome. The combined PM 2.5+NO2 metric showed the clearest positive associations with all non-accidental mortality and hospitalization. Respiratory hospitalization estimates were higher among seniors, but evidence of an age difference remained uncertain. An approximate 10-unit contrast in combined PM 2.5+NO2 corresponded to an estimated 1.5% (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.3, 2.2) increase in all non-accidental mortality and a 0.6% (95% CrI: 0.0, 1.3) increase in all non-accidental hospitalization, while the corresponding estimate for senior respiratory hospitalization was 2.7% (95% CrI: 0.9, 4.5). Several PM 2.5 and NO2 curves were nonlinear, whereas O3 associations were closer to linear over much of the observed range.
conclusionOur study introduces a flexible epidemiologic modelling framework for quantifying the short-term health impacts of correlated pollutants. The results highlight the value of accounting for nonlinear and joint exposure patterns in multi-pollutant settings, while uncertainty remains substantial for several cause- and age-specific estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.