ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Anomalous origin of the right pulmonary artery: Non-invasive diagnosis and early surgery].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The anomalous origin of a branch of the pulmonary artery from the ascending aorta (AORPA) is a rare congenital heart disease accounting for approximately 0.12% of congenital heart defects, associated with high mortality rates, up to 70%, if not treated in a timely manner. The clinical spectrum ranges from asymptomatic presentation to pulmonary hypertension and heart failure in the neonatal period. Clinical case: 2-month-old breastfed infant with anomalous origin of the right pulmonary artery from the ascending aorta, initially suspected due to the presence of a cardiac murmur and a positive cardiac screening. Echocardiography and computed tomography angiography confirmed the diagnosis, showing no stenosis of the anomalous branch and no significant pulmonary hypertension as estimated by non-invasive methods. Surgical reimplantation was performed with anastomotic enlargement using bovine pericardium. The postoperative course was complicated by transient respiratory issues, with a favorable clinical outcome. Conclusions: This case supports the usefulness of echocardiography and computed tomography angiography as tools for accurate anatomical diagnosis and based on each individual case for planning treatment. Furthermore, it reaffirms that, based on the specific anatomical characteristics of each case, direct reimplantation is not always the surgical technique of choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.