Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771825›Full record

ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026

[Professionalization of medical education: Axes and strategies for excellence].

Gilberto Guzmán Valdivia-Gómez

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gilberto Guzmán Valdivia-GómezUniversidad La Salle, Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Departamento de Medicina y Salud. Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-2317-3054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The professionalization of medical education is an essential, strategic renewal movement, driven by the need to graduate competent, ethical physicians who meet the demands of healthcare systems. This paradigm is structured around 3 interdependent axes: medical professionalism development (student), competency-based education (CBE) (institution), and medical faculty professionalization. The most advanced curricular model recommended is Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA), which translates generic competencies into observable and evaluable clinical tasks, such as obtaining a complete patient history. Successful implementation requires supporting infrastructure, including e-portfolio and learning management systems (LMS) for longitudinal tracking. The crucial challenge lies in transforming the teacher from a "clinical expert" to a "clinical-pedagogical expert", which necessitates restructuring the academic career with incentives, promotions, and compensation that value pedagogical training equally with clinical practice. Overcoming the institutional, faculty, and economic resistances generated by this reform depends on leadership capacity to manage change through the empowerment of leaders and modular micro-training.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationEducation, MedicalProfessionalismAcademiaClinical CompetenceCurriculumFaculty, MedicalHumansCompetencia ProfesionalEducación MédicaEducation, MedicalProfesionalismoProfessional CompetenceProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID42771825
PMCPMC13610913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.