ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Effectiveness of donor selection in a blood bank].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transfusion safety in Mexico depends on 2 essential pillars: The proper clinical selection of donors and the effective application of screening tests established in current regulations. Among these tests, it is included mandatory detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), as well as Trypanosoma cruzi and Treponema pallidum, all considered highly relevant pathogens due to their potential for bloodborne transmission and their clinical impact. Each year, thousands of people in the country acquire HCV, HBV, or HIV infections, and a significant proportion develop chronic complications that can lead to death. Given that current regulations have not been updated since 2012 and the proposed 2024 revision has not yet been approved, it is crucial to know which viruses might be present in apparently healthy donors despite the screening tests already performed on them. In this context, in this opinion article the effectiveness of donor selection and screening strategies was analyzed using the findings of an international collaborative study that analyzed pooled samples through massive parallel sequencing. Encouragingly, no traces of HIV, HBV, or HCV were detected, which suggests a favorable outlook for transfusion safety and supports the effectiveness of the procedures implemented at the National Medical Center's Blood Bank.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.