ReviewRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Pharmacological management of pain in chronic wounds and stomas in adult patients].
Review in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain associated with chronic wounds and stomas is a frequent and complex clinical problem that is often underestimated and undertreated. Its pathophysiology is multifactorial, since it combines nociceptive, inflammatory, and neuropathic mechanisms, which justifies the need for a comprehensive, multimodal pharmacological approach. This review critically analyzes recent evidence on systemic, topical, and adjuvant treatments used for the management of baseline pain, procedure-related pain, neuropathic pain, and breakthrough pain in patients with chronic wounds or stomas. Systematic reviews, clinical trials, and clinical practice guidelines published over the past 5 years were included. Non-opioid analgesics and opioids remain as the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment; however, their effectiveness may be limited when neuropathic components are unrecognized or poorly characterized. Topical formulations of local anesthetics, opioids, and emerging agents have demonstrated benefits, particularly in pain associated with wound care and local procedures. Likewise, gabapentinoids and dual-action antidepressants are effective in the management of neuropathic pain, while rapid-onset opioids may be considered for breakthrough pain in selected clinical contexts. Although the available evidence is heterogeneous, it supports an individualized approach that integrates different mechanisms of action and considers wound or stoma characteristics, patient comorbidities, and clinical safety aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.