ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026
Accent type modulates frequency-specific neural tracking of speech.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the real world, listeners often find speech in a non-native (L2) accent harder to understand than speech in their own native (L1) accent. In ideal laboratory listening settings, these struggles can become smaller. For this reason, most research on L2 accent processing uses speech-in-noise paradigms to avoid ceiling effects. Here, we explore whether neural tracking provides a sensitive measure of L2-processing difficulties, even in ideal listening conditions. In our electroencephalography (EEG) study, Canadian English-speaking adults were presented with Canadian (L1) and Mandarin-accented (L2) English. We assessed neural tracking of speech by analyzing coherence between the speech envelope and EEG. We found significantly stronger tracking for L1-accented speech, in canonical delta-theta frequencies, as well as higher-frequency bands associated with fine-grained phonemic encoding. Exploratory analyses illustrated that transcription errors correlated with neural tracking and that neural tracking was greater for L1- than L2-accented speech at the word and phoneme rate. These findings indicate that accent type modulates neural tracking of speech at specific frequencies, even in passive, quiet settings. This study highlights the sensitivity of frequency-specific neural tracking methods for elucidating subtle accent-related variations in speech, offering a foundation for future work on accent processing across more diverse speaker and listener populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.