Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771687›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Drift-diffusion dynamics of hippocampal replay.

Zhongxuan Wu, Xue-Xin Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhongxuan WuDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3507-0983
Xue-Xin WeiDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-477X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replay in the hippocampus during sharp-wave ripples is thought to play major roles in learning and memory. However, existing analysis methods often lead to inconsistent and inaccurate metrics for characterizing replay dynamics. We develop a novel computational framework that models the replay dynamics using a drift-diffusion process. Further, to capture the potentially rich population-level dynamics during sharp-wave ripples, our model allows switching between multiple well-motivated types of dynamics. Applications of our method to rat hippocampal recordings lead to a number of insights. First, our results reveal that a small fraction of SWRs are stationary, and those with drift-diffusion dynamics generally have a much higher speed than the animal's movement. Second, we find that replay dynamics are heterogeneous and inconsistent with a random walk model proposed previously. The mean-squared displacement of replay trajectories scales quadratically with time, supporting the presence of substantial drifts. Third, we find that only a tiny fraction of SWR events (less than 1%) exhibit sequential structure at the timescale of 100 ms before the animal had spatial experience in an environment. This suggests that, while neural activity in the hippocampus may be coordinated before the animal's spatial experience (i.e., preplay), the level of coordination is much weaker than that after spatial experience. Overall, our approach enables precise characterizations and unambiguous interpretations of population dynamics during sharp-wave ripples, which more broadly can provide a better understanding of the functions and underlying mechanisms of replay.

Indexed as

HippocampusMemoryModels, NeurologicalAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationRats

Identifiers

PMID42771687
PMCPMC13614660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.