ArticlePloS one2026
Parkinson's disease assessment with selfie video via feature engineering and explainable AI.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder fundamentally characterized by motor impairments and diminished facial expressivity. This study investigates the efficacy of feature engineering approaches applied to facial video data captured via smartphone frontal cameras to predict PD presence, disease severity, and motor function scores. Within a cohort of 40 participants, a combination of three predictive models, four facial movement scenarios, and five frame selection strategies was rigorously evaluated. Regarding PD classification, the XGBoost model achieved maximum performance using the smiling video scenario with frame skipping combined with PCA retaining 95% of the variance, yielding an accuracy of 0.77, a precision of 0.75, a recall of 0.86, and an F1-score of 0.79. For Hoehn & Yahr severity estimation, the Random Forest model implemented with the smiling video, frame skipping, and no PCA attained the best result, with the lowest RMSE of 1.30 and a MAPE of 38.36%. Furthermore, in The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III motor score estimation, the XGBoost model outperformed other configurations using the smiling video with 3-frame averaging and PCA retaining 95% of the variance, achieving an RMSE of 19.34 and a MAPE of 45.33%. Crucially, the Explainable AI analysis identified that lip and mouth corner movements were the most critical features for both PD classification and Hoehn & Yahr estimation. In contrast, eyebrow and eye movements were the dominant features for MDS-UPDRS Part III motor score estimation. These findings indicate that facial dynamics carry information relevant to PD assessment and support further development of non-invasive, accessible screening tools, although the accuracy achieved here is not yet sufficient to substitute for clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.