ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
In-silico personalized protein-protein interaction networks prioritize candidate compounds for glioblastoma.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of cancer continues to rise globally, with many tumor types remaining difficult to treat effectively. While existing drugs can alleviate symptoms or slow disease progression, their efficacy varies considerably between patients. To explore this challenge, we present a computational approach for identifying patient-specific candidate compounds. Our approach was developed for glioblastoma, but it can be applied to other types of cancer. Our study involves identifying possible disease-relevant proteins specific to each patient that underlie the generated networks, together with drug targets and proteins associated with cancer dependency. These networks are analyzed using centrality measures and Louvain community detection method. Then, further investigating the individual networks, network controllability analysis is applied to identify key regulatory targets within the network. These targets are filtered and ranked to prioritize candidate drugs for individualized treatment. By comparing results across patients and against networks based on generic data, we show substantial differences between patient-specific and generic network representations. Additionally, we track changes in patient-specific networks over time in five glioblastoma cases, exploring how molecular differences between primary and recurrent tumors may influence network structure and computational drug prioritization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.