Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771662›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

In-silico personalized protein-protein interaction networks prioritize candidate compounds for glioblastoma.

Nicoleta Siminea, Victor-Bogdan Popescu, Mihaela Păun, Ion Petre, Andrei Păun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicoleta SimineaFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-1718
Victor-Bogdan PopescuRevvity Inc., Turku, Finland.
Mihaela PăunBioinformatics, National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences, Bucharest, Romania.
Ion PetreBioinformatics, National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5014-5529
Andrei PăunFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of cancer continues to rise globally, with many tumor types remaining difficult to treat effectively. While existing drugs can alleviate symptoms or slow disease progression, their efficacy varies considerably between patients. To explore this challenge, we present a computational approach for identifying patient-specific candidate compounds. Our approach was developed for glioblastoma, but it can be applied to other types of cancer. Our study involves identifying possible disease-relevant proteins specific to each patient that underlie the generated networks, together with drug targets and proteins associated with cancer dependency. These networks are analyzed using centrality measures and Louvain community detection method. Then, further investigating the individual networks, network controllability analysis is applied to identify key regulatory targets within the network. These targets are filtered and ranked to prioritize candidate drugs for individualized treatment. By comparing results across patients and against networks based on generic data, we show substantial differences between patient-specific and generic network representations. Additionally, we track changes in patient-specific networks over time in five glioblastoma cases, exploring how molecular differences between primary and recurrent tumors may influence network structure and computational drug prioritization.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID42771662
PMCPMC13596792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.