Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771647›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Conditional spatial classification of expert-confirmed interictal epileptiform discharge epochs: An EEG-ECG ablation and SHAP analysis.

Al Mukshit Plabon, Abdul Mukit, Md Neyamul, Omar Faruk Jehady, Fatima Tuz Zuba, Md Faisal Mina, Torikul Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Al Mukshit PlabonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4226-5869
Abdul MukitDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4718-1171
Md NeyamulDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5435-5244
Omar Faruk JehadyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9427-8700
Fatima Tuz ZubaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1940-5584
Md Faisal MinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7324-7270
Torikul IslamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-9197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are diagnostically important EEG abnormalities, but after an epoch has already been confirmed as containing IED, a separate methodological question remains whether its scalp distribution can be assigned among predefined categories, and do routinely co-recorded auxiliary channels alter that classification. This conditional five-class tasks were evaluated using 2,514 expert-confirmed four-second IED epochs labelled as generalized, frontal, temporal, occipital, or centro-parietal. Identical stratified epoch-level partitions, training-only SMOTE, 26 handcrafted features per included channel, and multiple machine-learning classifiers were used across a staged channel ablation comparing 19-channel scalp EEG, 21-channel EEG with two ECG channels, and the complete 29-channel input containing scalp EEG, referential, ECG, and EMG channels. Linear discriminant analysis achieved the best EEG-only test accuracy (88.89%), whereas CatBoost achieved 93.25% on EEG with ECG signals and 94.44% with the whole channel. All eight directly comparable classifiers showed numerically higher test accuracy after ECG was added, although these differences were descriptive and were not subjected to formal paired significance testing. SHAP analysis identified the key channel-feature variables influencing the fitted models, complementing performance ablation. In the EEG with ECG on CatBoost model, ECG channels RA and LA contributed 15.79% and 15.12% of normalized global attribution, respectively, while beta-band power was the most important feature family, accounting for 18.76%. The study therefore provides a controlled analysis of downstream spatial categorization and auxiliary-channel dependence within expert-confirmed IED epochs. The results do not establish physiological localization, unseen-patient generalization, or a clinically validated ECG biomarker.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyElectroencephalographyEpilepsyBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsDiscriminant AnalysisHumansSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID42771647
PMCPMC13596800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.