ArticlePloS one2026
Using cycling as transportation and related adverse events during pregnancy: An anonymous questionnaire survey in urban Japan.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many pregnant women worldwide use bicycles as a mode of transportation. However, there is limited evidence regarding attitudes toward and the safety of cycling as a mode of transportation during pregnancy. This study aimed to clarify the prevalence of cycling as a mode of transportation before and during pregnancy and the adverse events associated with cycling during pregnancy. An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted among pregnant women who owned a bicycle, were at 37 weeks of gestation, and agreed to participate in the study at 14 institutions managing deliveries in Japan in 2024. Participants were provided with request forms containing a QR code linking to an anonymous questionnaire on Google Forms™. Among 1,130 women, the proportion who cycled for transportation decreased significantly from 80.8% before pregnancy to 51.2% during pregnancy (P < 0.001). One-third (34.2%) of women who cycled during pregnancy continued cycling until 37 weeks of gestation. The incidences of threatened abortion and preterm labor were similar regardless of cycling status during pregnancy. Of the 579 women who cycled during pregnancy, 21 (3.6%) fell off a bicycle, of whom 15 were injured. Eight women (1.4%) were involved in a bicycle accident during pregnancy, of whom four were injured. These adverse events occurred irrespective of gestational age. Logistic regression analysis showed that women who cycled ≥5 days per week during pregnancy had a significantly higher risk of falling off a bicycle (odds ratio, 3.17). Pregnancy was associated with a significant decrease in cycling as a mode of transportation; however, cycling-related adverse events during pregnancy were uncommon. Women who cycle ≥5 days per week during pregnancy should exercise particular caution to avoid falls. Safe cycling practices and helmet use should be more widely promoted during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.