ArticlePloS one2026
Yolov8-CA-EYHL: A bridge crack detection algorithm based on improved YOLOv8.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated bridge crack detection is challenging because cracks often exhibit weak contrast, irregular morphology, slender structures, and strong interference from complex surface textures. To address these issues, this study proposes a YOLOv8-CA-EYHL framework that combines filtering-equalization preprocessing with coordinate attention (CA) and enhanced high- and low-frequency feature learning modules. The filtering-equalization strategy improves crack-background contrast while suppressing background interference. CA enhances spatially directional feature representation, while the YHL module strengthens local and high-frequency crack features. The EYHL module further establishes multi-scale feature interaction and spatial recalibration to improve the representation of irregular and slender cracks. Ablation experiments demonstrate that the performance improvement results from the complementary contributions of preprocessing and the proposed architectural components. The proposed model achieves an mAP50 of 93.1% and an mAP50-95 of 63.5%, compared with 64.4% and 42.8%, respectively, for YOLOv8s. It requires 32.6 B FLOPs and 13.7 M parameters while maintaining an inference speed of approximately 76 FPS. Repeated experiments with different random seeds and evaluation on an independent external dataset provide further evidence of the stability and generalisation potential of the proposed framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.