Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771596›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

RA-PLA: Retrieval-augmented graph convolutional networks for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.

Karim Abbasi, Hossein Banadkuki, Reza Sepahvand, Shima Rashidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karim AbbasiMosaheb Institute for Mathematical Research, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2135-8864
Hossein BanadkukiMosaheb Institute for Mathematical Research, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Reza SepahvandComputer Engineering and Information Technology Department, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.
Shima RashidiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of Science and Technology, University of Human Development, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region ofIraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-750X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-ligand binding affinity (PLA) prediction is essential for computational drug discovery, yet existing deep learning methods typically employ a single globally trained model that fails to adapt to individual query samples. In this paper, we propose a novel end-to-end framework that retrieves hard protein-ligand pairs-samples whose nearest neighbors have conflicting labels under manifold smoothness constraints-and integrates them via a semi-supervised graph convolutional network (GCN). For each query, we automatically construct a graph where nodes represent protein-ligand pairs and edges encode pairwise similarities. Our model jointly learns joint descriptors, graph topology, and the GCN predictor. During inference, we fine-tune the model per query using its retrieved hard neighbors.We evaluate on four benchmarks: PDBbind, Davis, KIBA, and BindingDB. Our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches. On Davis, we achieve a Concordance Index (CI) of 0.952 ± 0.005 (1.6% improvement over NerLTR-DTA) and AUPR of 0.815 ± 0.005 (7.6% improvement). On KIBA, we achieve CI of 0.916 ± 0.002 and AUPR of 0.871 ± 0.005, outperforming DeepCDA by 2.7% and 5.9%, respectively. On PDBbind, our CI of 0.894 ± 0.002 represents an 11.4% improvement over PLA-MoRe. On BindingDB, we achieve AUPR of 0.518 ± 0.009 (5.9% improvement over DeepCDA). In cold-target generalization across four unseen protein families, we achieve average AUPR improvements of 15.5%. Paired t-tests confirm statistical significance (p < 0.05), and ablation studies validate that both hard sample retrieval and end-to-end learning are essential for performance gains. Our framework demonstrates that query-specific adaptation significantly enhances both accuracy and generalization in PLA prediction.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug DiscoveryProteinsAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinGraph Neural NetworksLigandsProtein BindingLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID42771596
PMCPMC13596814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.