ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Suspicion of sarcopenia as a predictor of toxicity in older people with cancer].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional status is considered the standard criterion prior to systemic therapy administration; however, in older adults with cancer, this criterion may lead to challenges in this group. Objective: To evaluate the association between suspicion of sarcopenia and systemic treatment toxicity in older adults with cancer. Material and methods: Prospective cohort study which included 150 older adults with recent diagnosis of cancer, candidates to systemic cancer treatment and who signed informed consent. Older adults with brain metastasis were excluded. Prior to systemic treatment, functional status variables were evaluated: skeletal muscle strength, sarcopenia screening, frailty, and chair stand test. Follow-up evaluations were performed before each systemic treatment cycle. Endpoint was considered as the clinical evidence or laboratory toxicity grade 3 or higher, using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, or the completion of the treatment regimen. Results: The incidence of systemic toxicity was 42.7%. In the comparison between patients without toxicity vs. patients with toxicity, the latter group showed a higher frequency of tobacco use, frailty, risk of sarcopenia, and lower grip strength. Only sarcopenia screening predicted systemic toxicity (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.13, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.16-3.91). Conclusions: The suspicion of sarcopenia was the only toxicity predictor for systemic therapy in older adults with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.