ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Reproducibility of pulse oximetry in the fingers of the hands].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Partial oxygen saturation from pulse oximetry is most often obtained from the fingers of the hands; however, it is not known whether any of the fingers are ideal for estimating partial oxygen saturation. Objective: To describe the partial oxygen saturation behaviour obtained from the fingers of both hands. Material and methods: Using a cross-sectional analytical design, the partial oxygen saturation was consecutively estimated in the fingers of both hands. Demographic data were obtained from healthy subjects, and they were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance; reproducibility was calculated using the mean difference (limits of agreement) and its magnitude using the intraclass correlation coefficient or ICC (95% confidence interval [95% CI]); a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 1000 determinations of partial oxygen saturation were studied from the fingers of both hands of 100 subjects (64% women) whose average age was 34 ± 10 years old and whose body mass index (BMI) was of 23.5 ± 5 kg/m2. Partial oxygen saturation was 90.3 ± 4% and reproducibility was almost perfect in all combinations; however, the right index finger versus right ring finger combination was the best: 90.3 ± 4.1% versus 90.5 ± 4% mean difference (limits of agreement) -0.2 (2.5, -2.8) between both and the ICC (95% CI) 0.942 (0.916, 0.961). Conclusions: Partial oxygen saturation is reproducible in all fingers, with no clinically relevant differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.