Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Work reintegration in patients treated for diabetic macular edema].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has increased in prevalence, and with it, complications such as diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema (DME), which cause disability due to visual impairment and high medical and social costs, as it is the leading cause of blindness in the economically active population aged 18 to 64. Intravitreal anti-angiogenic (anti-VEGF) therapy is the first line of treatment. Objective: To estimate the proportion of patients with DME who return to work and the time required after treatment. Material and methods: Based on literature and local data with a response rate ≥ 60%, an observational study was planned; the analysis was descriptive, and the post-intervention comparison was performed using the chi-square test. Results: 45 patients were included (26 women, 19 men; 57.4 ± 5.0 years; T2DM duration 16 [12-20] years), with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema: proliferative 53.3%, mild non-proliferative 22.2%, severe 17.8%, moderate 6.7%. Functional success (visual acuity, [VA] ≥ 0.5) was achieved in 70% of mild non-proliferative cases and 25% of proliferative/severe cases. Mean gain in decimal VA was + 0.127 RE and + 0.090 LE. A total of 33.3% reached VA ≥ 0.5 after loading doses, a functional level compatible with reading and precision tasks. An inverse correlation was observed between central macular thickness and final VA. Conclusions: Early intervention maximized the benefit with intravitreal anti-VEGF, improving function and anatomy in DME. A significant proportion of patients of working age returned to work, reducing days of disability and improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.