Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771487›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Female Budgerigars Attend Equally to Rhythmic Beat or Repetition, While Humans Prioritize Their Combination.

Felix Haiduk, Daniel L Bowling, Shahrzad Afroozeh, Jan Kopač, Mahin Azarian, Marisa Hoeschele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Felix HaidukAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-3627
Daniel L BowlingDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5303-5472
Shahrzad AfroozehDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2977-1207
Jan KopačDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mahin AzarianAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Marisa HoescheleAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2102-0882

Funding

Austrian Science Fund W1262-B29ERASMUS mobility traineeshipUniversità degli Studi di PadovaVDS CoBeNeVienna Science and Technology Fund ANIML (LS23-014)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythm is an essential aspect of human music, typically characterized by temporal regularity of sound events and repetition of rhythmic patterns. One key biological trait for human rhythmic behavior is the ability to entrain movement to sound events, an ability possibly related to vocal production learning. Parrots share both of these crucial traits with humans. Budgerigars in particular can entrain to a beat, and female budgerigars, like humans, prefer rhythmic sounds. What remains unclear is whether this attraction to rhythm is based on the same features that are important in humans. If so, this could suggest shared mechanisms and/or functions. Using a three-choice place preference paradigm for both species, we found that female, but not male, budgerigars preferred rhythmic over arrhythmic stimuli, with equal preference for repetition and regularity. Humans preferred stimuli containing a regular beat, with a tendency to prioritize the combination of regularity and repetition. We suggest that female budgerigar preferences are driven by features of budgerigar warble song displayed in courtship contexts, while humans are driven by group chorusing behavior. We discuss how differential behavioral exploitation of shared biological traits may have had different evolutionary consequences and offer suggestions for how these can be tested.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMelopsittacusMusicPeriodicityVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleanimal cognitionbeatbehaviorbudgerigarsmusicalitypreferencerhythm

Identifiers

PMID42771487
PMCPMC13596745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.