ArticleJMIR human factors2026
Shifting Skills in Robot-Assisted Surgery: Case Study With Interdisciplinary Perspectives for Human Factors and Career Research.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The introduction of STARA (smart technology, AI, robotics, and algorithms) changes work processes and the application of skills, depending on specific task design within a given context. Objective: From a Human Factors perspective, this study uses empirical data from a case study to demonstrate how different task designs influence the application of theater nurses' skills during robot-assisted surgeries. Moreover, from a transdisciplinary perspective, the data elucidate that STARA-related task design extends beyond Human Factors' perspectives, encompassing cross-level effects between task configurations of different surgical units and individual evaluations regarding career motives. Finally, the study aims to integrate interdisciplinary perspectives by outlining theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for both STARA-related Human Factors task design in health care and Sustainable Career Research. Methods: Empirical data derive from an embedded single-case study design within a hospital. The case study illustrates field experiences from a focus group interview (n=5) and postsurgery surveys (n=36) on Human Factors-related variables (objective task variety, perceived workload, perceived application of professional skills), and variables from Career Research (perceived career sustainability, growth needs). Results: Higher task variety and skill application during surgeries correlate with long-term career sustainability evaluations. Moreover, career-related growth needs relate to interindividual differences in STARA task evaluations. Interdisciplinary perspectives with respect to theoretical models, practical implications, and methodological challenges are discussed. Conclusions: The introduction of STARA (smart technology, AI, robotics, and algorithms) changes work processes and the application of skills, depending on specific task design within a given context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.