Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771344›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Decomposition of Black and White Infant Mortality Rates.

Monica J Alexander, Rohan Alexander, Leslie Root

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monica J AlexanderDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rohan AlexanderDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leslie RootInstitute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The infant mortality rate (IMR) of the non-Hispanic Black population in the US remains more than twice that of the non-Hispanic White population. Understanding this disparity in terms of differences in gestational age distribution, mortality risk within gestational age categories, and specific causes of death is essential for targeting interventions. Objective: To decompose the Black and White infant mortality gap into gestational age composition and mortality risk components and to identify the causes of death that may be factors in recent changes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Records from the US National Center for Health Statistics from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2024. Participants included all live births to non-Hispanic Black mothers and non-Hispanic White mothers with known gestational age and plausible birth weight for gestational age. Exposures: Maternal race and ethnicity of non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary measures were the composition effect (differences in gestational age distribution) and rate effect (differences in within-gestational age mortality) from a Kitagawa decomposition of the mortality difference between infants born to Black and to White mothers, overall and by specific cause of death. Results: There were 57 870 726 live births and 336 384 infant deaths in the non-Hispanic Black (141 651 [38.7%] of all deaths) and non-Hispanic White (224 733 [61.2%] of all deaths) populations between 2003 and 2024. The Black IMR declined from 13.2 (95% CI, 12.9-13.5) to 10.7 (95% CI, 10.5-11.0) deaths per 1000 live births between 2003 and 2024, while the White IMR declined from 5.6 (95% CI, 5.5-5.7) to 4.3 (95% CI, 4.2-4.4) deaths per 1000 live births. The absolute gap decreased from 7.7 to 6.0 deaths per 1000 live births between 2003 and 2019, but then increased to 6.4 (95% CI, 6.1-6.8) deaths per 1000 live births. The gestational age composition effect accounted for a majority of the difference across study years, but the rate effect increased as a share of the gap from 21% (95% CI, 18%-24%) in 2003 to 32% (95% CI, 28%-35%) in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024, the share of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) to the gap showed the largest increase of any single cause (0.18 deaths per 1000 live births; SUID gap in 2024, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.42-1.71] deaths per 1000 live births). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of IMRs, gestational age composition differences accounted for the largest share of the Black and White infant mortality gap. However, the increased share of the mortality risk component over time underscores the need for targeted interventions beyond preterm birth prevention.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanInfant MortalityWhiteCause of DeathCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42771344
PMCPMC13598697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.