Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771330›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Radiofrequency-based stump management and ductal ablation in robotic central pancreatectomy: a technical note and initial experience.

Andrea Vicinanza, Patricia Sánchez-Velázquez, Fernando Burdio, Benedetto Ielpo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea VicinanzaDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Patricia Sánchez-VelázquezHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Passeig Maritim 25, 08034, Barcelona, Spain.
Fernando BurdioHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Passeig Maritim 25, 08034, Barcelona, Spain.
Benedetto IelpoHepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Passeig Maritim 25, 08034, Barcelona, Spain. ielpo.b@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-3208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central pancreatectomy is a parenchyma-sparing procedure for benign or borderline lesions of the pancreatic neck and proximal body but remains associated with high rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), largely related to distal remnant management and pancreatico-enteric reconstruction. We describe a novel robotic-assisted technique incorporating radiofrequency (RF)-based stump management combined with endoductal ablation of the main pancreatic duct as a reconstruction-free strategy. This approach is based on our previous preclinical and clinical experience demonstrating that RF-assisted pancreatic transection may improve stump sealing, while ductal ablation induces controlled exocrine atrophy, reducing enzymatic output and potentially mitigating POPF. The technique includes intraoperative ultrasound-guided resection, selective RF application at the transection surface, and intraductal RF ablation using a catheter-based system, without distal pancreatico-enteric anastomosis. Four consecutive patients underwent the procedure. No patient developed POPF or other pancreas-specific complications. This RF-based hybrid strategy represents a biologically driven alternative to conventional reconstruction in central pancreatectomy, with the potential to reduce morbidity while preserving pancreatic parenchyma. These preliminary findings should be regarded as a proof of technical feasibility rather than as evidence of clinical efficacy in reducing POPF, and require validation in larger prospective studies.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.