Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771305›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027

DNA Repair Mechanisms.

Pelin Dilsiz, Fatma Zehra Hapil

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pelin DilsizDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science and Letters, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, 34469, Turkey.
Fatma Zehra HapilDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07058, Turkey. fatmazehrahapil@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA undergoes a wide range of chemical reactions every day, and such DNA lesions might have deleterious consequences as they not only affect cellular components and biological processes but can also accumulate permanently in the genome. Since DNA alterations eventually lead to multiple detrimental consequences, including genomic instability and cancer predisposition, these lesions must be efficiently detected and repaired by tightly regulated mechanisms to maintain genome integrity. Various DNA repair mechanisms contribute to the correction of the alterations that occur every day to prevent genomic instability, providing key insights into genome editing. Genome editing is a significant exogenous mutagen, in which conventional editing strategies cause double-strand breaks, and nickases induce single-strand breaks, albeit base editing depends on the modulation of base excision repair, and prime editing results in mismatches. A comprehensive understanding of DNA repair mechanisms is strategically important for genome editing applications. In this chapter, we discuss the pivotal DNA repair mechanisms to provide a better insight into the role of DNA repair mechanisms in genome editing.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnimalsDNADNA DamageExcision RepairGene EditingGenomic InstabilityHumansDNABase excisionDirect repair of DNA alkylationDNA repairHomology directed repairMicrohomology-mediated repairMismatch repairNonhomologous end joiningNucleotide excisionSingle strand annealing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.