Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771287›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Comparative evaluation of bionote FMD NSP Ab and PrioCHECK

Khomotso Moabelo, Livio Heath, Angelika Loots, Sven Parsons, Melvyn Quan

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khomotso MoabeloDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. u12170004@tuks.co.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7470-4268
Livio HeathTransboundary Animal Diseases, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X05, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa.
Angelika LootsDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-3309
Sven ParsonsDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9033-9686
Melvyn QuanDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-8488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious viral disease associated with serious economic challenges. Effective serological diagnostics are essential for managing the disease properly. Detection of antibodies against non-structural proteins (NSPs) of the FMD virus (FMDV) differentiates between infected and vaccinated animals. This study evaluated the comparative performance of the commercially established PrioCHECK

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralCattle DiseasesFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusViral Nonstructural ProteinsAnimalsCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssaySensitivity and SpecificitySerogroupAntibodies, ViralViral Nonstructural ProteinsAphthovirus vesiculaediagnostic agreementFoot-and-mouth diseaseSAT serotypes

Identifiers

PMID42771287
PMCPMC13597599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.