ArticleCognitive processing2026
Grammatical number as linguistic quantity: spatial-response compatibility effects in Turkish.
Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing body of research suggests that numerical magnitude is associated with spatial response coding, as demonstrated by the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect. Recent work has extended this question beyond Arabic digits to linguistic expressions of quantity, including grammatical number. The present study examined whether Turkish singular and plural word forms show spatial-response patterns compatible with SNARC-like mappings. Eighty-six native speakers of Turkish completed a combined Go/No-Go lexical decision and grammatical number judgment task. Participants responded to real Turkish words while withholding responses to pseudowords; response mappings were counterbalanced such that singular forms were associated with the left-hand response and plural forms with the right-hand response in the typical mapping condition, with the reverse assignment in the non-typical mapping condition. Reaction times were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Participants responded faster in the typical mapping condition than in the non-typical mapping condition, and plural forms elicited slower responses than singular forms overall. However, the interaction between grammatical number and response mapping was not significant. These findings suggest that Turkish grammatical number can interact with spatial response organization, but the observed pattern is better interpreted as a general SNARC-compatible mapping advantage rather than a fully differentiated spatial mapping of singular and plural forms. The form of this association may depend on task characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.