ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
Identification and functional annotation of drought-induced molecular pathways in sugarcane using suppression subtractive hybridization.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWild ancestors of sugarcane, in particular Saccharum spontaneum, are inherently tolerant to abiotic stress. Interspecific hybrids derived from S. spontaneum possess agronomically desirable traits in addition to their potential for sustaining themselves in drought-stressed conditions. METHODS AND
resultsIn our study, suppression subtractive hybridisation was used to identify drought-responsive candidate transcripts (DRCTs) under water deficit conditions in AS 04-1687 and TS-GS 2024, which were validated by physiological and molecular expression analysis. The amplicon size of the subtraction libraries ranged from 200 bp to 1.6 kb for AS 04-1687, whereas for TS-GS 20-24, it ranged from 250 bp to 1.1 kb. The sequenced raw reads were processed, assembled, and functionally annotated. A total of 452 and 625 differentially expressed drought-induced transcripts were identified in AS 04-1687 and TSGS 20-24, respectively. Functional annotation revealed that the expression of a substantial portion of these transcripts was associated with protein modification. In AS 04-1687, drought tolerance was associated with coumarin-mediated stress responses, whereas in TSGS 20-24, drought response was regulated by ABA-mediated signalling cascade and the ascorbate biosynthetic pathway.
conclusionTranscripts belonging to the MYB, NAC, bZIP, SPL, and WRKY were identified as key regulators of drought stress in both genotypes, while in TSGS 20-24, additional transcriptional regulation via JAZ families contributed to coordinating plant defence via ABA signalling, osmotic adjustment, and physiological remodelling. These findings offer valuable insights for identifying novel genes that enhance drought resistance in sugarcane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.