Article3D printing in medicine2026
3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation significantly improves the accuracy of prosthesis alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis, with its outcomes highly dependent on the accuracy of prosthesis positioning. Conventional UKA, performed using traditional instrumentation, often relies heavily on surgical experience and may lead to variability in alignment. The emergence of 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) offers a promising approach to improve prosthesis placement accuracy and operational reproducibility. This study aims to evaluate the postoperative prosthesis position and short-term clinical outcomes of UKA assisted by 3D-printed PSI.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients (25 knees) who underwent PSI-guided UKA between May 2023 and May 2024. These were compared with 25 patients (31 knees) undergoing conventional UKA during the same period. Postoperative radiographic assessments included prosthesis position, limb alignment, and range of motion (ROM) in the sagittal plane. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using functional scores.
resultsBoth groups showed significant improvement in limb alignment and knee function postoperatively (p < 0.05), with no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative FTA within or between groups. The PSI group demonstrated superior outcomes in AKS-K score (91.7 ± 8.2 vs. 85.5 ± 6.9) and ROM (128.6° ± 9.4° vs. 120.3° ± 7.4°) compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Prosthesis positioning was significantly more accurate in the PSI group regarding coronal and sagittal alignment of both tibial and femoral components (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in joint line height restoration.
conclusion3D-printed PSI significantly enhances the accuracy of prosthesis positioning in UKA, reduces operative time, and lowers the learning curve for less-experienced surgeons. Its core value lies in translating complex biomechanical requirements into standardized, executable surgical plans, thereby minimizing outliers in key alignment parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.