ArticleParasitology research2026
Molecular, parasitological and clinical diagnosis of female genital schistosomiasis: A diagnostic yield and comparative accuracy study using latent class analysis.
Article in Parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFemale genital schistosomiasis (FGS) is a neglected manifestation of Schistosoma haematobium infection whose diagnosis is restricted by the absence of a flawless "gold standard" diagnostic tool. This study compared the yield, accuracy, performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), urine egg microscopy, and colposcopy.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 143 female participants from S. haematobium-endemic communities in the West Region of Cameroon between July and August 2024. Participants underwent urine microscopy, genital swab PCR, and colposcopy, and a two-class latent class analysis model was developed using the R package poLCA.
resultsPCR yielded the highest positivity rate (73.4%), followed by urine egg microscopy (29.4%) and colposcopy/Visual FGS (23.08%). Among women with visual FGS, 68.75% were PCR-positive and had a lower median Ct value (29.6) than PCR-negative women (32.8) by SYBR Green PCR. Within the LCA framework, PCR provided a baseline sensitivity of 100.00% (95% CI: 94.85%-100.00%) and a specificity of 95.20% (95% CI: 91.88%-98.52%). urine egg microscopy and colposcopy/visual FGS served as highly specific rule-out tools with specificities of 83.32% (95% CI: 62.75%-100.00%) and 83.33% (95% CI: 62.76%-100.00%), despite their lower sensitivities of 29.06% (95% CI: 17.5%-40.62%) and 38.27% (95% CI: 29.92%-46.62%) respectively.
conclusionThe LCA model confirmed that a negative result from traditional tools cannot rule out infection necessitating the use of complementary diagnostic tools. However, clinicians should interpret positive PCR outcomes with care, as molecular detection cannot distinguish between active infection, recent parasite exposure, or residual DNA from past infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.