Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771187›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026

Specific treatment of ATTR-CM in Germany-expert consensus of the German Society of Amyloid Diseases (DGAK) and German Cardiac Society (DGK).

Fabian Aus dem Siepen, Teresa Trenkwalder, Birgit Aßmus, Ingrid Kindermann, Daniel Lavall, Sebastian Spethmann, Lars Michel, Timon Hansen, Sebastian Kruck, Christoph Rischpler and 10 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Fabian Aus dem SiepenClinic for Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Fabian.Siepen@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-1722
Teresa TrenkwalderDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine and Health, German Heart Centre Munich, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Birgit AßmusDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Ingrid KindermannDepartment of Internal Medicine III - Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Saarland, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Daniel LavallKlinik Und Poliklinik Für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian SpethmannDeutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité - Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Lars MichelDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Timon HansenOnkologicum HOPA, Hamburg, Germany.
Sebastian KruckCardio Centrum Ludwigsburg Bietigheim, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Christoph RischplerKlinik Für Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum Stuttgart, KatharinenhospitalStuttgart, Germany.
Fabian KnebelSana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Fanningerstraße 32, 10365, Berlin, Germany.
Stéphanie K SchwartingClinic for Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Udo BavendiekDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Maria PapathanasiouUniversitäres Herz- Und Gefäßzentrum, Universitätsmedizin Frankfurt, Deutsches Zentrum Für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Standort Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany.
Ute HegenbartClinic for Hematology, Amyloidosis Center, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ali YilmazDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiology I, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Katrin HahnDepartment of Neurology With Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander CarpinteiroDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Roman PfisterFaculty of Medicineand, Department III of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Caroline MorbachDpt. Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is an increasingly recognized cause of heart failure. Three disease-modifying agents are now approved for treatment in Germany: the transthyretin (TTR) stabilizers tafamidis and acoramidis, and the TTR gene silencer vutrisiran. In the absence of head-to-head trials, practical guidance for individual treatment decisions is lacking.

methodsA multidisciplinary expert panel appointed by the German Society of Amyloid Diseases (DGAK) and the German Cardiac Society (DGK) performed a comprehensive review of pivotal randomized controlled trials, open-label extension studies, real-world data, and the approved German summaries of product characteristics to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations.

resultsAll three agents have demonstrated significant reductions in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations in phase 3 trials with comparable efficacy and tolerability profiles. Due to the absence of direct comparative studies, the panel concludes that tafamidis, acoramidis, and vutrisiran, based on the current scientific data, are considered similarly effective for most patients with confirmed ATTR-CM. An exception applies to patients with hereditary ATTR-CM and a mixed phenotype (concurrent cardiomyopathy and polyneuropathy), for whom vutrisiran is recommended as first-line therapy. Combination therapy is safe but, lacking randomized data regarding efficacy, cannot be recommended at present. Treatment decisions should incorporate patient preferences, comorbidities, mode of administration, and local regulatory frameworks. Regular monitoring using clinical parameters, biomarkers including TTR serum levels, and cardiac imaging is recommended.

conclusionsThis consensus provides a practical framework for the specific treatment of ATTR-CM in Germany, aiming for early treatment initiation. Local standards and shared decision-making remain essential for the establishment of ATTR-CM therapy in an individual patient.

Indexed as

AcoramidisAmyloidosisATTR-CMTafamidisVutrisiran

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.