ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Learning curve for second-stage laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy: an exploratory CUSUM analysis with prospective ultrasonographic follow-up.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo characterize the sequential changes in operative time and Doppler-confirmed perfusion across the longitudinal second-stage laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy experience of an early-career academic pediatric urologist within a surgeon-educator practice.
methodsAll consecutive second-stage attempts for laparoscopically confirmed intra-abdominal testes performed and/or supervised by the index surgeon from February 2020 to October 2025 were identified. Ninety completed procedures (106 operated testes) entered the CUSUM analysis and segmented into series phases; two additional attempts that could not be completed as orchidopexies remained visible in the overall experience. Operative-time CUSUM was a descriptive running deviation from the overall mean. A Wald binary CUSUM monitored absent intratesticular flow on protocolized Doppler ultrasonography. Its 7%/16% failure-rate assumptions were borrowed from procedure-level complication data in open pyeloplasty and were not validated for this perfusion endpoint; a 5%/10% sensitivity model was also examined.
resultsThe 90 completed procedures were accumulated over 5.7 years (mean 15.7 per year). Satisfactory postoperative scrotal position was documented in 86/90 cases (95.6%); absent Doppler flow in 4/106 testes (3.8%); and a relative volume deficit of at least 50% in 33/101 evaluable testes (32.7%), underscoring that these outcomes are not interchangeable. CUSUM-OT reached its first fitted landmark at case 26 and plateaued approximately through case 44, although the cubic fit was weak (R2 = 0.14), phases means were similar (p = 0.876). Administrative OR-log review showed that the index surgeon was ecorded as most-responsible/ supervising surgeon in 81/90 cases (90%), increasing across phases 1-4 from 73.1% to 89.5%, 100%, and 100%, respectively (p = 0.002). CUSUM-CR crossed the favourable boundary at case 41 under the 7%/16% model and case 57 under the 5%/10% sensitivity model; later absent-flow events occurred at cases 72 and 78. Four postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade I-II events and one separate intraoperative vasal-vessel injury occurred.
conclusionOperative-time and outcome based CUSUM suggested an early plateau beginning around case 26. This supports approximately 25-30 cases as a hypothesis-generating estimate of the evolution from greater primary-operator participation early on the series toward a consistentlyy supervisory, teaching, and mentoring role in a comparable academic setting, not as a stand-alone test of competence or a credentialing threshold. The model-dependent perfusion signal and later failures support continued multidimensional outcome surveillance after that interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.