ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Signatures of rapid trajectory control during finger and arm movements.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Normative goal-directed hand and finger movements often follow invariant kinematics, characterized by approximate straight-line trajectories. A fundamental unresolved issue is whether movement trajectories are planned or whether they are a consequence of trajectory-free online control. We addressed this question using Spearman's rank correlation, zero-crossings rate, and z-scores, and analyzed the time evolution of kinematic variability during the presence or absence of a task in finger and whole-arm reaching movements. We found that the central nervous system (CNS) implements control that is consistent with task-dependent trajectory regulation, where task-relevant movements showed enhanced control toward an average trajectory. Further, we found behavioral signatures of rapid kinematic control that might operate on these planned trajectories as early as ~ 60 ms in finger movements and ~ 70 ms in whole-arm reaching movements. Such early signatures of control in behavior suggest that the system could exploit a trajectory plan along with fast feedback to implement meaningful corrections during simple voluntary unperturbed movements. The analysis also revealed that the control peaked distinctly during the early (20%) and late (80-90%) phases, among both finger and arm movements, implying that the extent of trajectory control was not constant during the execution of movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.