Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771171›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Anal canal neoplasms in the modern era: integrating HPV biology, LAST terminology, and evolving molecular classification.

Kathleen Byrnes, Lysandra Voltaggio

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathleen ByrnesPathology and Immunology, WashU Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-1120
Lysandra VoltaggioDivision of Gastrointestinal and Liver Pathology, Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America. lvoltaggio@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2611-7576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anal canal neoplasia comprises a heterogeneous and evolving group of precursor lesions and invasive malignancies whose classification increasingly depends on integrating morphology, human papillomavirus association, immunophenotype, and molecular alterations. This review summarizes current concepts in the pathology of anal canal neoplasms, with emphasis on practical application of Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology, distinction between low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and the role of ancillary testing in diagnostically challenging cases. We discuss the expanding spectrum of invasive neoplasms, including human papillomavirus-driven and human papillomavirus-independent squamous cell carcinoma, anorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma, and anal adenocarcinoma, highlighting recently described subtypes and their clinicopathologic significance. Attention is given to emerging molecular correlates, including alterations in TP53, CYLD, and other oncogenic pathways, which may refine classification and prognostic stratification. The review also addresses unresolved issues, including precursor lesions for human papillomavirus-independent disease, evolving terminology for glandular and mixed lesions, and controversy regarding staging of anal adenocarcinoma. By combining contemporary terminology with morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings, this review provides a practical framework for pathologists navigating an uncommon but increasingly complex diagnostic area.

Indexed as

Anal canal neoplasmsHuman papillomavirusMolecular pathologySquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.